MSD
Announces Positive Study Investigating the Use of Pembrolizumab Compared to
Chemotherapy in Patients with Ipilimumab-Refractory Advanced Melanoma
MSD, known as Merck in the
United States and Canada, announced today that a pre-specified analysis of
investigational data from a pivotal Phase 2 study (KEYNOTE-002) showed
pembrolizumab, the company’s anti-PD-1 therapy, substantially improved the
primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS, as assessed by RECIST 1.1,
independent central review) (HR 0.57 and 0.50 for 2 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg every
three week doses, respectively), compared to chemotherapy (P<0.0001 for both
comparisons) in patients with ipilimumab-refractory advanced melanoma (n=540).1
At six months, the PFS rates for pembrolizumab were 34 percent at the 2 mg/kg
dose (95% CI, 27-41) (n=180) and 38 percent at the 10 mg/kg dose (95% CI,
31-45) (n=181), compared to 16 percent for chemotherapy (95% CI, 10-22)
(n=179). The median duration of follow-up at the interim analysis was 10
months.1
“These findings demonstrate
pembrolizumab was superior to chemotherapy in helping more patients with
ipilimumab-refractory advanced melanoma achieve progression-free survival”
These findings, including
pre-specified analyses of overall response rate (ORR), duration of response,
safety and health-related quality of life (HRQoL), were presented today in an
oral session by Dr. Antoni Ribas, professor, Hematology/Oncology and Surgery,
and director of the Tumor Immunology Program at the Jonsson Comprehensive
Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles at the Society of Melanoma
Research (SMR) 2014 International Congress in Zurich, Switzerland.
“These findings
demonstrate pembrolizumab was superior to chemotherapy in helping more patients
with ipilimumab-refractory advanced melanoma achieve progression-free
survival,” said Dr. Eric Rubin, vice president, global clinical development for
oncology, Merck Research Laboratories. “The comparative efficacy and safety
data from the pivotal KEYNOTE-002 study validate and extend the findings from
our earlier study in these difficult-to-treat patients, and we look forward to
sharing data on overall survival at a future congress.”
For the pre-specified
analysis of PFS, no significant differences were observed between pembrolizumab
doses (HR 0.91, range 0.71-1.16) (P<0.44). An assessment of PFS by
investigator review was shown to be consistent with the central review findings.
In addition, the PFS effect in favour of pembrolizumab was consistent across
all pre-specified sub-groups.1
The objective of the
pre-specified analysis was to evaluate the superiority of either dose of
KEYTRUDA over chemotherapy for PFS (conducted after ≥ 270 PFS events at a 0.25%
significance level) (one-sided) (estimated HR, 0.66). The study was designed
with co-primary endpoints of PFS and overall survival. An evaluation of overall
survival is planned at the pre-specified final analysis in 2015.
Additional
Efficacy Data and Safety from the KEYNOTE-002 Study
Overall response rates
(confirmed) for pembrolizumab were five to six times higher compared to
chemotherapy. For pembrolizumab, ORR was 21 percent at 2 mg/kg dose (95% CI,
15-28) and 25 percent at 10 mg/kg dose (95% CI, 19-32), compared to 4 percent
for chemotherapy (95% CI, 2-9) (P<0.0001 for both comparisons). At the time
of pre-specified analysis, the median duration of response for pembrolizumab
was not reached, and confirmed responses were ongoing in 92 percent of patients
receiving 2 mg/kg dose (range 6+ to 50+) and 87 percent receiving 10 mg/kg dose
(range 5+ to 48+), respectively. The median duration of response was 37 weeks
for chemotherapy arm and 63 percent of responses were ongoing (range 7+ to 41).
There was no significant difference in ORR or duration of response between the
doses of pembrolizumab (P=0.21).
In a pre-specified
exploratory analysis for HRQoL, patients treated with pembrolizumab reported a
significantly smaller decrement in health status/quality of life score compared
to those treated with chemotherapy (based on European Organization for Research
and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life Questionnaire or “EORTC
QLQ-C30”). The mean change from baseline at week 12 (difference in least
squares) for pembrolizumab compared to chemotherapy was 6.52 (P=0.011) at 2
mg/kg dose and 6.57 (p=0.009) at the 10 mg/kg dose, respectively.
The incidence of adverse
events was consistent with previously reported data for pembrolizumab. Despite
longer median treatment duration, the incidence of treatment-related, grade 3-5
adverse events was lower with pembrolizumab at 2 mg/kg dose (11%) and at 10
mg/kg dose (14%), compared to chemotherapy (26%). Serious treatment-related
adverse events were observed for pembrolizumab at 2 mg/kg dose (8%) and 10
mg/kg dose (11%), and for chemotherapy (10%). Immune-related grade 3 adverse
events observed for pembrolizumab across doses included hepatitis (n=3),
colitis (n=2), pneumonitis (n=3), hypophysitis (n=1) and iritis or uveitis
(n=1). No grade 4/5 immune-related adverse events were reported. Three percent
of patients receiving pembrolizumab at 2 mg/kg dose and 7 percent at the 10
mg/kg dose, as well as 6 percent receiving chemotherapy discontinued treatment
due to investigator assessed, treatment-related adverse events. One
treatment-related death was reported for pembrolizumab and none in the
chemotherapy arm.
No comments:
Post a Comment