‘Our goal is to provide a total
end-to-end solution to our clients’
Kezzler has created a
unique programme which helps in eliminating counterfeit drugs. Dr Avi
Chaudhuri, Chief Business Officer and Head of India Operations, Kezzler talks
about the programme, its USPs and more, in an interaction with Usha Sharma
Counterfeit drugs are a big challenge in the pharma sector. What are
your solutions to counter this problem?
Dr Avi Chaudhuri
Kezzler has a diverse set
of solutions to meet virtually every brand protection required for the pharma
sector. Broadly speaking, our solutions can be divided into two areas.
The first solution is
consumer empowerment. Kezzler was the first company in India to set up a robust
point-of-sale (POS) verification system to empower consumers to authenticate
their medicine right after purchase. Each saleable unit protected by Kezzler
contains an encrypted alphanumeric code generated by our patented cryptographic
algorithm. The consumer can text the code to a dedicated number or scan the 2D
barcode on the medicine packs. Either way, a verification message arrives on
the handset immediately, providing both assurance as well as any other
pertinent information that the brand owner wishes to transmit.
The second solution that
Kezzler offers is aimed at the brand owner. The idea is to empower them via
their own personnel to survey the market place in order to find and document
instances of counterfeit medicines.
Over the years, we have
developed a large set of tools and technologies to assist our customers and to
ensure that their brands are fully protected. It is our view that the fight
against counterfeits must be a shared cause. On the one hand, consumers need to
be encouraged to verify their purchases, but at the same time, the brand owner
must undertake robust initiatives on their own to combat this menace and
protect the equity of their brands. We provide a highly customised set of
solutions that are tailored to each individual client in order to meet their
risk mitigation objectives.
How effective is Kezzler’s technology ‘PASS’ SMS? How is it designed to
suit the pharma sector?
The Kezzler PASS programme
with Pfizer is a great success story that is now being expanded to more
products and territories. We currently protect some of the biggest and most
important drugs for Pfizer, including Viagra, Lipitor and Norvasc. In order to
protect its consumers and the brand, Pfizer had experimented with different
solutions over the years, all well documented in the public domain. Pfizer then
relied on Kezzler’s global experience of more than a decade in combating the
counterfeit menace to put together an exceptional solution, with fantastic
results. The Kezzler programme was launched a couple of years back based on a
unique tamper-evident label with our encrypted security code and various other
protective features.
The combination of
technologies that we brought to bear on this programme representing both
consumer empowerment through POS verification as well as trading partners
throughout their supply chain, has resulted in substantial escalation of
genuine sales, providing an excellent return on investment (ROI). Most
importantly, customers are no longer being duped into buying fake medicines.
What is the USP of your products? Are they cost effective solutions as
well?
There are two broad areas
that encompass our unique selling point — technology and service. In terms of
technology, one of our USPs concern code security. The unique identifier
(alphanumeric security code) that we apply on each product is created by our
patented cryptographic algorithm. The most important aspect of this platform is
that none of the codes generated by our algorithm are actually stored in a
database for future look up. Instead, when we receive a code for validation
from a consumer, agent or inspector we simply run the algorithm to determine if
the code was generated by us. If so, the validation test passes and the code
(along with the product) is determined to be genuine. The absence of a database
means there is nothing to hack and no data to steal. Imagine a situation where
a database gets hacked and the data is stolen. It would represent a public
relations nightmare for the owner, something that actually happens quite
frequently. This is a critical reason why seven of the top 10 global pharma
companies rely on Kezzler to protect their brands and consumers. The absence of
a database in the Kezzler environment also means that the number of products we
protect can be infinitely expanded. Hence, programme scalability represents a
second core USP of the Kezzler platform. Even a mid-sized Indian pharma company
creates many millions of consumer units each year. Given the fact that all this
data needs to be maintained for several years, it can easily be seen that
expansion limits will quickly creep in with standard database formats offered
by all other companies. The Kezzler platform can even accommodate security
coding down to the individual tablet level so that expansion to trillions of
unit codes is fully possible. Our clients will never be constrained by code
delivery capacity or validation limits.
A third technology-related
USP concerns system performance. By not having to rely on a database to look up
a particular security code at the time of validation, we are able to bypass the
prolonged search times that occur with large database systems. We just run our
algorithm to decrypt a code when it hits our servers and therefore the response
time is in the order of milliseconds, whether we have generated five thousand
or five billion codes for a client. The last thing a brand owner will want is
to test their customers’ patience by having them wait intolerably to discover
whether they have a genuine product in their hands.
The second broad area of
our USP is with regard to service. As an engineering company, what we love to
do most — and what we are best at — is customising our offerings for the
specific needs of our clients. It would be accurate to say that all our clients
in India rave about the ‘Kezzler service’. But it all starts long before the
programme rolls out. There are no two clients that have exactly the same
requirements — their products are different, their brand protection strategies
are individualised, and each has a different long-term vision. We work with
each company to tailor a custom-designed solution that fits their risk
mitigation objectives and requirements. We are often told that we are the only
company in this space that has the global knowledge of best practices combined
with the technological capacity to deliver winning solutions. And that to me is
our core USP because after all, our customers must be satisfied with the
outcome.
And yes, Kezzler does all
of the above in a most cost-effective manner. We are a benefit-driven company
that operates on a competitive cost scale to create an outstanding value
proposition. The resulting ROI is perhaps our most endearing USP.
What is your experience regarding the deployment of serialisation in
India’s pharma industry?
We see two types of pharma
companies in India. One that is value-driven and another that is purely
cost-driven. The companies in the second category want the cheapest solution,
period. On the one hand, I can understand the necessity to be economically
sound and not pay more than you need to, especially in a competitive climate.
However, an outlook that is purely cost-centric in my opinion creates a myopic
vision of running a business because the long-term economic benefit of having a
‘good’ solution rather than the ‘cheapest’ solution is then thrown out the
window. Many pharma companies are discovering the folly of this approach
because the regulatory requirements are becoming ever more demanding.
Furthermore, their competitors in the pharma space who decided to proceed with
a value-driven approach are able to take advantage of innovations and best
practices in our field that low cost solution providers simply cannot deliver.
The gain perceived by
companies taking the cost-driven approach is short-lived and quickly leads to
major problems. There are many examples, but I will give just one here as an
illustration. The Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) programme initially
required a mere unique serial number on a package for it to leave India. That
is simple enough and therefore many Indian pharma companies chose to adopt very
low-cost solutions without thinking of the expanding requirements ahead. Well,
now that time has come. The DGFT recently introduced a significant new
requirement — the so-called monocarton rule — along with additional procedural
mandates that are to be introduced in early 2015. Furthermore, the growing list
of countries with stringent new regulatory demands for pharma exports will
impose a whole new set of challenges. The low-end vendors are simply not
capable of meeting all these new regulatory demands, leaving their clients
struggling to find alternative solution providers that have the technology,
experience, and expertise to help them.
So, an interesting dynamic
is emerging in India. Cost-driven companies are now discovering that they need
to join their peers in the value-driven group. And that is good for us, because
that is exactly the space Kezzler is in, and where we firmly want to be.
Do you think there will be rapid growth in the serialisation process in
Indian pharma ? How well prepared is your company to tap this opportunity?
There will be an immense
growth in Indian pharma serialisation starting in 2015, due to both export
regulations and domestic business practices. The DGFT monocarton rule will
create a many-fold expansion of the items that need to be serialised before
leaving India. Latin American countries (Brazil and Argentina) have
serialisation due dates starting as early as 2015. The 28 countries comprising
the EU will require pack-level serialisation by 2017. And you can throw into
the mix various other countries (Korea, Saudi Arabia, etc.) with
fast-approaching deadlines, as well as various new countries we are aware of
that will make announcements very soon. Consequently, Indian exporters need to
get their serialisation programmes fully into gear right away so that they are
not frozen out of these plum markets.
On the domestic front, we
are seeing very good movement among our own clients and many new ones as they
seek to protect their customers and preserve their brand equity. But it’s a lot
more than just risk mitigation. Unique product coding provides an excellent way
for a brand owner to connect with its customer on a one-to-one basis directly
through the mobile handset. We offer a large set of very exciting programmes
that capitalise on this connection, which are all custom-made for the unique
requirements of each client.
I believe that Kezzler is
exceptionally well prepared to tap into all of these opportunities. We have
been in India since 2006 and in fact introduced the very concept of
serialisation to the Indian pharma industry. In the early days, people would
often wonder why is this fellow telling me to put a number on my product.
Serialisation has become a mainstream concept since then and with its universal
acceptance now as the best way to protect people and products, many Indian
companies are turning to us. Most of our new customers come to us by way of
referrals from many of our happy clients. And quite often, someone will move
from one company to another and discover the serialisation problems unfolding
there, and then point out that the Kezzler solution at their previous company
runs like a Swiss watch.
India’s DGFT has postponed the implementation of barcodes on primary
packages a couple of times. How will this move affect the industry?
A major initiative such as
the DGFT programme will necessarily require postponements. In the past, I
believe the postponements were helpful for the concept to settle in and for
companies to think through how best to move forward. But we are now at a
tipping point. Even if there is a postponement on the monocarton rule, which I
predict will not happen, the industry simply cannot wait because of the
regulatory demands outside of India and the mere fact that so many companies
are moving rapidly forward. If you are not doing it yourself then your
competitor is, and therefore you are already behind in terms of protecting your
products in the wider global market.
As for the primary
products, such as blisters, strips, etc., I am of the opinion that unless these
represent the saleable consumer unit in the export market, then they should not
be serialised at all. In nearly all cases, exported blisters and strips are
placed in a monocarton (or polypack) because unlike the situation in Indian
pharmacies, the vast majority of medicines in overseas markets are contained in
a monocarton. Therefore monocartons absolutely need to be protected; otherwise,
the DGFT programme itself would have a huge design flaw. The bottom line is
that blister and strip serialisation (primary level) should be scrapped because
it is not needed and would actually be very difficult and costly to implement
for the Indian pharma industry, especially the SMEs. I therefore hope the delay
for security coding of primary-level products is permanent. The only exception
is bottles that are sold as such. This is classified as a ‘primary’ and yet if
not placed in a monocarton, then it represents the saleable unit. From a
consumer interaction point of view, this is no different than a monocarton and
therefore should be protected.
How many pharma companies have adopted this technology?
Serialisation as a
technology strategy is now widely adopted among exporters, due almost entirely
to current and emerging regulatory demands. On the domestic front, the main
driver has been risk mitigation, although we are seeing more and more
excitement over our consumer engagement and data analytics offerings. From a
risk mitigation point of view, our programmes have been immensely successful.
For example, the Swiss
drug giant Roche made a painful discovery about 10 years back that counterfeit
variants of their oncology drugs were surfacing in India. They engaged Kezzler
as early as 2007 and we put together a terrific programme for them that
empowered both consumers and clinicians. The programme was so successful that
no further instances of fake Roche products were seen in India. And if you
think about it, there was a very committed counterfeiter out there who had gone
to great pains to create an artificial product with absolutely no therapeutic
value, and which was being sold for thousands of rupees. However, these
criminals did not even dare take the chance of replicating our technology for
the simple reason that they knew we would have caught them. So the result was
that counterfeit oncology drugs moved out of India and started surfacing in
other markets, all the while Indian cancer patients were fully protected.
The case with Viagra
represents another such success story, though obviously with a very different
drug. The growing presence of fake Viagra represented a worrisome problem for
Pfizer, both from a healthcare perspective as well as its business operations. Kezzler
created a unique programme as discussed earlier, which again resulted in the
elimination of counterfeits from those markets where our technology was
applied. Consumers are now protected and the brand owner is deriving
significant ROI from revenue growth through sales of the genuine product.
How can this technology help brand image and scale up profitability?
We believe information
exchange has great value for brand owners and consumers, allowing for a real
time dialogue and the beginning of a deeper relationship.
We are seeing a lot of
creative brand managers who are able to harness both the power of serialisation
and the exponential growth in mobile communications. As an innovation-driven
company, Kezzler is constantly coming up with creative new ideas on how to
capitalise on this technology to bring greater opportunities to brand owners
and most importantly, to the vast numbers of people out there who crave
information and value. Simply put, those brand managers that can take rapid
advantage of the powerful new opportunities in mobile communication, consumer
engagement, and informatics-driven product branding will increase their brand
value and profitability. And Kezzler helps them create outstanding new
programmes to drive their business.
No comments:
Post a Comment