Number
of cancer cases in India predicted to double in next 20 years
Afew months ago, a large
number of medical scientists pored over databases of cancer patients in India.
The scientists were from cancer hospitals and research centres like Tata
Memorial Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), King's
College in London, and other major cancer centres in India and abroad. Cancer
databases on India are scarce, and are not always reliable due to the
inadequate documentation of cancer cases in the country. But what was available
was enough to tell a striking story:
India
is on the verge of a major cancer 'epidemic'.
India reports about one
million new cases every year. This is 15% less than the US, whose population is
one-third that of India. The disturbing fact is that the India number is
predicted to double in 20 years, according to the International Agency for Research
on Cancer (IARC), based in Lyon, France.
An even more disturbing
fact is that, in spite of a much lower rate of incidence, as many people in
India die of cancer as in the US. "Cancer mortality is high in
India," says CS Pramesh, professor at the department of surgical oncology
at the Tata Memorial Hospital in Mumbai. "And so the impact of cancer on
Indian society is very high." Pramesh was among the doctors who did the
study, which was published this week in a series of papers in the medical
journal Lancet.
The
costs
The GLOBOCAN project of
IARC, which looks at cancer statistics in 184 countries, estimated that 14
million new cases were recorded in the world in 2012. About 8 million people
died of cancer in 2012, of which nearly 700,000 were in India. So, India has
17% of the world's population and about 8% of its cancer patients. But these
figures are deceptive, as India has a lower life expectancy and an overwhelming
proportion of young people.
In the US, 1.6 million are
expected to be diagnosed with cancer this year and 585,000 are expected to die.
So, the cost of cancer to Indian society is much greater than in developed
countries, and this cost is expected to rise quickly over the decade. Cancer
knocks off 2% of the world GDP. No one knows what this number would be in
India.
The rising incidence of
cancer in India is usually explained away by demographics.
People are living longer,
and cancer is often the disease of an aging population. However, there seem to
be other factors at work. A majority of India's cancer patients are between 30
and 69 years of age, an anomaly that cannot be simply explained away by saying
that it has more people in that age group.
Something else seems to be
at work that is adding to obvious causes like smoking, and we don't quite know
it as yet. But we do know the disease is disrupting Indian families and their
finances. "Cancer affects everybody," says Kiran Mazumdar-Shaw,
chairman and managing director of Biocon. She should know: she has seen her
mother and her best friend suffer from the disease.
In the near future, which
is actually the present, cancer will extract a big cost from households. At
3.9% of GDP, Indian spending on healthcare is one of the lowest in the world.
Of this, the government spends only 21%, leaving people to fight major diseases
on their own. With early detection and better therapies, more and more cancer
will be cured or better managed. The costs, however, are not easy to manage.
"India cannot afford to spend huge amounts of money caring for sick people,"
says Ajay Mahal, chairman of global health at Monash University in Australia.
A year ago, Mahal was the
first researcher to estimate the financial burden of cancer on Indian
households. He and his colleagues used data from 74,000 homes and looked at
1,645 homes with a cancer patient. They found that cancer-afflicted homes spent
36-44% more during the period under study. They borrowed more and sold assets,
and put additional burden on healthy members of the family. Data for this study
is from 2004, and costs have only increased since. "Health expenditures
rise faster than household income," says Mahal.
The
causes
This cost will keep
rising. Newer methods of diagnosis and cures require high investments. As
technology advances, the cost of diagnosis and monitoring keeps going up. Newer
drugs are expensive. With genetic screening, cancer is now increasingly treated
individually, and targeted therapies are more expensive than general ones.
Cancer patients are living longer, which also means longer duration of
treatment. All this is bad news in a country where most medical expenses are
out of pocket. "There is considerable private investment in the corporate
sector," says R Sankaranarayanan, special advisor on cancer control, IARC,
"but many do not complete treatments due to unaffordable costs."
India's poor
infrastructure is one of the reasons why so many die of cancer. It is often
detected late, where it has advanced to a point where treatment is difficult.
India's leading cancers in men are also not curable: lung cancer and oral
cancer. The second highest killer in the country, cervical cancer, is curable
but not detected early enough. Smoking and tobacco use is the leading cause of
cancer in India.
"Quit rates of
smoking in India are quite low when compared to that of the West," says
Prabhat Jha, cancer researcher and chair of disease control at the University
of Toronto.
In a report released two
months ago, IARC warned that cancer can be beaten only through a combination of
prevention, early detection and new therapies. In India, this means finding the
main causes and removing them. Recent research throws up clues on what is wrong
besides smoking and tobacco use. For example, people along the Ganges Belt get
the deadly gall bladder cancer, and pollution is the likely cause. Those living
along the coast get stomach cancer, and the cause seems to be fried fish.
There are general causes
as well.
Fatty food and sedentary
lifestyles are a deadly combination. Women who have few children—and in later
life—are at risk of breast and ovarian cancer. There seems to be a link between
air pollution and lung cancer. Widespread use of plastics is another major
cause, especially when burnt in open fields. "Cancer is going to be
India's biggest epidemic," says Harit Chaturvedi, chief oncologist of Max
Healthcare. No one seems to be safe from this malady.
No comments:
Post a Comment